• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET SPINE - BROOMFIELD SPF SPINAL FUSION STIMULATOR; IMPLANTABLE STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET SPINE - BROOMFIELD SPF SPINAL FUSION STIMULATOR; IMPLANTABLE STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/05/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The biomet spine implantable spinal fusion stimulators physician¿s manual & full prescribing information for spf plusmini, spf - xl iib establishes the following ¿handling¿ instructions in the ¿precautions¿: ¿do not disconnect the leads from the cathodes during the surgical procedure.¿ different from what is instructed in handling precaution notice of the biomet spine spf physician¿s manual, the surgeon utilized a minimally invasive surgical technique which requires the detachment and disconnection of the lead/cathode connectors pre-operatively or prior to implantation to permit him to pull the lead and cathode apart; thus, allowing passage one of those under the patient¿s skin line before reattaching it.Even though, the physician didn¿t follow the corresponding product ifu rendering the product inoperable for use, the unfavorable event of disengagement of the dbs cable from the connector could also occur during explantation.Based on the results of evaluation the disengagement of the dbs cable from the male pin connector crimp is most likely caused by the overlap of the actual pull force yield of this connection (9.3 to 18 pounds) and the male pin-female socket connection (2.5 to 13.3 pounds).This overlapping issue was also aggravated by an apparent inadequate crimping equipment adjustment which in turn caused an increase in the overlapping range between both connections.The risk of having the dbs cable disengaged from the male pin connector crimp during the implantable stimulator explantation procedures is not significant as at this stage since therapeutic treatment has already completed and that the male pin connector will remain covered by the pin sleeve, thus preventing direct contact of the titanium pin with human tissue.The patient would have completed their therapeutic treatment as intended and there would be no adverse effect during subsequent mri testing post-explantation.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The sales associate reported that for the past three years, pre-operatively the surgeon disconnects the cathodes from their corresponding unit leads in order to conduct stimulator implantation using a minimal invasive mis procedure.During a procedure on (b)(6), 2015 the cable of the stimulator disengaged (separated) from the male pin connector crimp joint and therefore was unable to be used in the surgery.No adverse events were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPF SPINAL FUSION STIMULATOR
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET SPINE - BROOMFIELD
310 interlocken parkway
suite 120
broomfield CO 80021
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET SPINE - BROOMFIELD
310 interlocken parkway
suite 120
broomfield CO 80021
Manufacturer Contact
michelle cole
310 interlocken parkway
suite 120
broomfield, CO 80021
3034437500
MDR Report Key5140335
MDR Text Key28347023
Report Number3004485144-2015-00061
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PP850035
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Report Date 09/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/01/2016
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number10-1335M
Device Lot Number222550
Other Device ID NumberSEE H10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/09/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/06/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-