(b)(4).Although we have not established that the device caused or contributed to the event, we're reporting it to be compliant with 21 cfr part 803 and out of an abundance of caution.Method/results/conclusion code: directions for use indicate rubber dam use is required.The office did not maintain isolation, which is inadequate.By immediately rinsing patient the dentist likely prevented further injury.Actual device has not been returned.Device not returned.
|
Dds left a voice message for us regarding gluma desensitizer (gd) and a patient that had experienced anaphylactic reaction on thursday morning, (b)(6) 2015.The patient is an approximately (b)(6) year old female in for a cleaning appointment.She told the hygienist that her teeth are sensitive and the doctor applied gd, using a bend-a-brush, to the lingual and facial surfaces of teeth 7-10.I asked if a rubber dam was used and she said no.I asked what happened next and was told the patient said her gums were burning, then her upper lip began to swell, then her throat started to tingle.The doctor gave her a couple of benadryl tablets and one of her assistants drove the patient to a near-by minor care center.Once at the center, the patient said her throat began to close and it became hard to breathe.The clinic administered an epinephrine shot and gave her a steroid.I am not clear on the method of administration of the steroid.The doctor called the patient thursday evening and again on friday morning.The patient said she was feeling better but was exhausted from the experience.The doctor has not had contact with the patient since.I asked the doctor if the gd was rinsed and she indicated they rinsed for several minutes.
|