|
Catalog Number 388.720 |
Device Problem
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: patient information is unknown.Event date: unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.(b)(6).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A review of the device history records has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that upon use, part of the cutting blade fragmented off.The device was not able to be used.It happened during surgery but there was no prolongation.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(6).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Manufacturing date: 03 june 2009.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A product investigation was completed: our investigation has shown that a round shaped piece at both blades of the bolt cutter is broken off.The manufacturing documents were reviewed and no complaint related issues were found.The lot in question was manufactured in the year 2009 according to the specification.The intact part of the cutting blades show slight wear marks, which can be expected at a bolt cutter that was used over several years.Based on these findings we conclude that the cause of failure is not due to any manufacturing non-conformances.There was no information about the cutting procedure provided, which makes it impossible to determine the exact cause of this occurrence.However, we were able to reproduce the same kind of damage during a performed test with a new bolt cutter, by cutting an extra-hard cobalt-chromium rod.With this type of rod the new bolt cutter was damaged in the same manner after one cut.In this relation we would like to point out that this device is not suitable for cutting cobalt-chromium alloys.For cutting this kind of rods the uss rod cutting and bending device must be used.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|