Country of complaint: (b)(6).Revision surgery (hip) due to ceramic breakage was being performed and when the surgeon was trying to insert the product (pe insert) into the metal shell, it would not fit.Several attempts were made to insert from different directions, however, were unsuccesful.The surgery was completed using a 0 degree insert.Closed reduction was necessary due to anterior luxation after surgery.
|
Investigation: the components have been examined visually and microscopically with a keyence vhx-5000 digital microscope and a panasonic dmc tz8 digital camera.We made a visual inspection of the implant.Here we found visible damage and a scratch.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for the lot number and found to be according to the specification, valid at the time of production.Conclusion and root cause: the root cause of the problem is most probably usage related.Rational: according the quality standard and dhr files, a material defect or production error can be excluded.No similar incidents have been filed with products from this batch.We assume that the visible damages were caused due to the implantation.For the failed fitting there is the possibility of an impure inner cone of the exterior cup.No capa is necessary.
|