• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EVO-22-27-9-D
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 09/16/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Incident meets reporting criteria of an mdr report based on the reporting precedence established for this device family for 'stent fracture'.This complaint relates to an evo-22-27-9-d device of lot #c1020125.The device was not available to be returned for evaluation as the stent remains implanted in the patient.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.The customer complaint was confirmed based on customer testimony and images received.Prior to distribution, all evo-22-27-9-d devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records for evo-22-27-9-d device of lot number c1020125 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The notes section of instructions for use instructs the user to "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use".Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.Incident meets reporting criteria of an mdr report based on the reporting precedence established for this device family for 'stent fracture'.This complaint relates to an evo-22-27-9-d device of lot#c1020125.The device was not available to be returned for evaluation as the stent remains implanted in the patient.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.The customer complaint was confirmed based on customer testimony and images received.Prior to distribution, all evo-22-27-9-d devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records for evo-22-27-9-d device of lot number c1020125 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The notes section of instructions for use instructs the user to "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use".Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Patient got repeated vomiting and other uncomfortable symptoms after implanted the stent for three months.The physician did the endoscopy for patient and found the wire of stent (near to the proximal end) was broken/fractured.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not available to be returned for evaluation as the stent remains in the patient.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.The cirl research & development engineer provided the following comments in relation to this complaint: "the stent was in the patient for approx 3 months.It can be observed that one of the stent crowns (located in the antrum of the stomach) was broken in the images provided.The devices were not returned for further investigation.The most likely cause of failure is due to a combination of stomach acid and repeated mechanical forces leading to fatigue of the wire.It cannot be determined if the failure mode was exacerbated by clinical conditions." the customer complaint was confirmed based on customer testimony and the images received.Prior to distribution, all evo-22-27-9-d devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for evo-22-27-9-d device of lot number c1020125 did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.The notes section of instructions for use instructs the user to "visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would prohibit proper working condition, do not use".Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Patient got repeated vomiting and other uncomfortable symptoms after implanted the stent for three months.The physician did the endoscopy for patient and found the wire of stent (near to the proximal end) was broken/fractured.Incident meets reporting criteria of an mdr report based on the malfunction precedence established for this device family for 'stent fracture'.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead quaid
o'halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
061334440
MDR Report Key5167989
MDR Text Key28919546
Report Number3001845648-2015-00209
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCN
PMA/PMN Number
K101530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberEVO-22-27-9-D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date09/16/2015
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/25/2015
Initial Date FDA Received10/22/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/09/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/17/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
-
-