• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERAKOS INC. THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERAKOS INC. THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Lot Number C156 - KIT
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 10/09/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The system was used for treatment.A review of kit lot c156 was performed.There were no nonconformances related to this complaint.This lot met release requirements.The uvadex lot number was not provided, since uvadex was not administered.However, a review of all uvadex lots manufactured since january 2013 was performed.No trends or nonconformances related to the complaint were noted.Trends were reviewed for complaint category, drive tube leak/break.No trends were identified.A corrective and preventive action was initiated for complaint category, drive tube leak/break.This assessment is based on information available at the time of the investigation.Analysis of the photographs sent by the customer is still in progress.A supplemental report will be filed when this analysis is complete.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Customer called to report drive tube break "5-10 minutes into treatment".Dual needle mode.Treatment was aborted.The patient was reported to be stable and was cleared by the provider for discharge.Customer reported the base of the centrifuge bowl was still on the platform, but the bowl was shattered and the leak detector strip was damaged.Customer does not recall receiving any alarms.Customer reports that their biomed will do the repair.The customer sent pictures for investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Photos were returned for analysis.Review of the photos indicated that the bowl break was below the cover to bowl weld on one half and above the weld on the other half.The cover is shown still in the platen with a section of the bowl attached.The drive tube is broken just above the bowl.The cause of the leak was a bowl break.The analysis determined it is likely that the bowl break occurred first, causing a break in the drive tube.However, the cause of the bowl break could not be determined.All cover to bowl welding parameters were within the qualified ranges during manufacturing.A material trace of the two components found no nonconformances.No manufacturing defect could be identified.Review of the device history record found no related nonconformances.The complaint lot passed all lot release testing.(b)(4).Not returned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
CELLEX
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERAKOS INC.
west chester PA
Manufacturer (Section G)
HARMAC MEDICAL PRODUCTS
2201 bailey ave.
buffalo NY 14211
Manufacturer Contact
megan vernak
53 friontage road
suite 300
hsmpton, NJ 08827
MDR Report Key5181431
MDR Text Key30068798
Report Number2523595-2015-00274
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNR
UDI-Device Identifier10705030100009
UDI-Public10705030100009
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P860003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Nurse
Device Expiration Date07/01/2016
Device Lot NumberC156 - KIT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/09/2015
Initial Date FDA Received10/27/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age28 YR
Patient Weight83
-
-