The system was used for treatment.A review of kit lot c156 was performed.There were no nonconformances related to this complaint.This lot met release requirements.The uvadex lot number was not provided, since uvadex was not administered.However, a review of all uvadex lots manufactured since january 2013 was performed.No trends or nonconformances related to the complaint were noted.Trends were reviewed for complaint category, drive tube leak/break.No trends were identified.A corrective and preventive action was initiated for complaint category, drive tube leak/break.This assessment is based on information available at the time of the investigation.Analysis of the photographs sent by the customer is still in progress.A supplemental report will be filed when this analysis is complete.(b)(4).
|
Photos were returned for analysis.Review of the photos indicated that the bowl break was below the cover to bowl weld on one half and above the weld on the other half.The cover is shown still in the platen with a section of the bowl attached.The drive tube is broken just above the bowl.The cause of the leak was a bowl break.The analysis determined it is likely that the bowl break occurred first, causing a break in the drive tube.However, the cause of the bowl break could not be determined.All cover to bowl welding parameters were within the qualified ranges during manufacturing.A material trace of the two components found no nonconformances.No manufacturing defect could be identified.Review of the device history record found no related nonconformances.The complaint lot passed all lot release testing.(b)(4).Not returned.
|