• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED; MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EVO-22-27-12-D
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/30/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was requested, however no further information has been received to date.It was indicated that the device involved in this complaint was available to be returned for evaluation but to-date the device has not been received at cook (b)(4).As the device has not been received the cause of this complaint could not be conclusively determined.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.The customer complaint was confirmed based on customer testimony.Prior to distribution, all evo-22-27-12-d devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.A review of the manufacturing records for the evo-22-27-12-d device of lot number c998632 revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.As per the instructions for use, notes section advises the user of the following: ¿if package is opened or damaged when received, do not use.Visually inspect with particular attention to kinks, bends and breaks.If an abnormality is detected that would inhibit proper working condition, do not use." from the information provided there were no adverse effects to the patient.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for emerging trends.
 
Event Description
The first evo-22-27-12-d stent was placed successfully.Upon placing the second stent and removing the wire, the entire device came out with the wire; the stent never deployed.Possible break in the handle.Incident meets reporting criteria of an fda mdr report based on the reporting precedence for this device family for 'deployment issue resulting in exposed stent removed from patient with the delivery system' regardless of patient outcome.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This correction follow up report is being submitted to cancel the initial report submitted relating to this event.Initial complaint description submitted as follows: the first (b)(4) stent was placed successfully.Upon placing the second stent and removing the wire, the entire device came out with the wire; the stent never deployed.Possible break in the handle.No adverse effects to the patient were reported to have occurred due to this incident.From the complaint information provided this incident initially met reporting criteria of an fda mdr report based on the reporting precedence for this device family for 'deployment issue resulting in exposed stent removed from patient with the delivery system' regardless of patient outcome.The device evaluation confirmed that the delivery system was returned for evaluation with no part of the stent exposed.The stent was fully retracted in the sheath.Based on the device evaluation this incident no longer meets the reporting criteria of an fda mdr report.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for emerging trends.This correction follow up report is being submitted to cancel the initial report submitted relating to this event.Initial complaint description submitted as follows: the first (b)(4) stent was placed successfully.Upon placing the second stent and removing the wire, the entire device came out with the wire; the stent never deployed.Possible break in the handle.No adverse effects to the patient were reported to have occurred due to this incident.From the complaint information provided this incident initially met reporting criteria of an fda mdr report based on the reporting precedence for this device family for 'deployment issue resulting in exposed stent removed from patient with the delivery system' regardless of patient outcome.The device evaluation confirmed that the delivery system was returned for evaluation with no part of the stent exposed.The stent was fully retracted in the sheath.Based on the device evaluation this incident no longer meets the reporting criteria of an fda mdr report.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for emerging trends.
 
Event Description
This correction follow up report is being submitted to cancel the initial report submitted relating to this event.Reference the additional mfg narrative-notes section for this justification.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUTION® DUODENAL CONTROLLED-RELEASE STENT - UNCOVERED
Type of Device
MUM STENT, METALIC EXPANDABLE, DUODENAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead quaid
o'halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
061334440
MDR Report Key5183663
MDR Text Key29709352
Report Number3001845648-2015-00213
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K101530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/22/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberEVO-22-27-12-D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/22/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date09/30/2015
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/02/2015
Initial Date FDA Received10/28/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/18/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/13/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-