• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA) INTELLATIP MIFI¿ XP TEMPERATURE ABLATION CATHETER; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FLUTTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA) INTELLATIP MIFI¿ XP TEMPERATURE ABLATION CATHETER; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FLUTTER Back to Search Results
Model Number M004PM4790N40
Device Problems Bent (1059); Device Sensing Problem (2917)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 08/24/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).Device evaluated by manufacturer - the device has a kink at 13mm from the tip.In addition has char in the base of the tip and the ring #1 and broken adhesive on it.The ablation was verified by using the maestro generator 4000 and the device was found within specifications.Electrical test was performed and the device was found out of specifications.The device has a intermittent short between tip and r1.The handle was opened finding no issues to the connector.The stiffening rod was removed identified a possible affected area, however, no issues were identified.The stiffening rod has not damages on it.The device was dissected after the torque hole finding the following: the r1 wire is peeled close to the ring soldering.This area match with the kink in the center support and a burning mark in the tip wire.This caused the short between tip and r1.Evidence of fluids was found inside the shaft.Regarding the kink in the distal section the device was dissected finding the center support kinked at 14mm from the tip.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Reportable based on analysis completed on 04oct2015.It was reported that tip damage and loss of signal occurred.Ablation was performed with an intellatip mifi xp temperature ablation catheter, however the 1-2 electric potential stopped appearing.Upon removal the tip of the catheter was noted to be deformed.The device was exchanged to another intellatip mifi xp temperature ablation catheter to complete the procedure.No additional patient complications were reported and the patient status is good.However; returned device analysis revealed char on the catheter tip and peeling between the electrodes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLATIP MIFI¿ XP TEMPERATURE ABLATION CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FLUTTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA)
302 parkway
la aurora
heredia
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (HEREDIA)
302 parkway
la aurora
heredia
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5188381
MDR Text Key29859381
Report Number2134265-2015-07274
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P020025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/04/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/07/2017
Device Model NumberM004PM4790N40
Device Catalogue NumberPM4790N4
Device Lot Number17511087
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/28/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/04/2015
Initial Date FDA Received10/29/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/18/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-