• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX¿ TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX¿ TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number M00564760
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Activation Failure (3270)
Patient Problem Pneumonia (2011)
Event Date 10/20/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event of catheter difficult to remove.Reported event of stent failed to expand.Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Event Description
Note: this report pertains to one of three devices used within the same patient.Refer to manufacturer report 3005099803-2015-03216, 3005099803-2015-03217 and 3005099803-2015-03218 for the associated device information.It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2015 that three ultraflex tracheobronchial stents were implanted to treat a 2cm stricture due to lung cancer in the right upper lobe during a bronchial stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous and had not been dilated prior to stent placement.During the procedure, the physician fully deployed the first ultraflex tracheobronchial stent (the subject of this report); however, the stent did not fully expand inside the patient.The physician removed the delivery system but the stent came out together with the delivery system.The physician attempted to fully deploy the stent outside the patient but it did not fully expand.The physician attempted to implant a second ultraflex tracheobronchial stent (the subject of mfr report # 3005099803-2015-03217); however, when the stent was deployed approximately 5 mm from the distal side, the suture got stuck and failed to completely deploy the stent.The stent was removed from the patient partially deployed.Once the device was removed, the physician attempted to deploy the stent and the stent was able to be fully deployed outside the patient.The third ultraflex tracheobronchial stent (the subject of mfr report # 3005099803-2015-03218) was fully deployed inside the patient; however, the stent failed to completely expand.During removal, the distal tip of the delivery system got stuck within the stent and the stent came out together with the delivery system.The procedure was completed with another ultraflex tracheobronchial stent.It was reported that the patient experienced pneumonia.In the physician's assessment, the pneumonia occurred due to prolonged procedure time and not due to the stent issues.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An ultraflex tracheobronchial stent and delivery system were returned for analysis.Visual examination of the returned device found that the stent was deployed from the delivery device.The maximum stent outer diameter (od) was measured at 10mm, which was within product specification.A visual and tactile examination of the catheter found that the shaft was kinked.The kink was located at 95mm proximal to the tip.This kink was consistent with excessive force having been applied to the shaft.An examination of the skive identified no anomalies.Device analysis determined that the condition of the returned device was not consistent with the complaint incident.The cause of the damage noted during analysis was most probably due to the anatomical and procedural factors encountered during the procedure.Therefore, the most probable root cause for this complaint is operational context.A labeling review was performed and from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.
 
Event Description
Note: this report pertains to one of three devices used within the same patient.Refer to manufacturer report 3005099803-2015-03216, 3005099803-2015-03217 and 3005099803-2015-03218 for the associated device information.It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(4) 2015 that three ultraflex tracheobronchial stents were implanted to treat a 2cm stricture due to lung cancer in the right upper lobe during a bronchial stent implantation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous and had not been dilated prior to stent placement.During the procedure, the physician fully deployed the first ultraflex tracheobronchial stent (the subject of this report); however, the stent did not fully expand inside the patient.The physician removed the delivery system but the stent came out together with the delivery system.The physician attempted to fully deploy the stent outside the patient but it did not fully expand.The physician attempted to implant a second ultraflex tracheobronchial stent (the subject of mfr report # 3005099803-2015-03217); however, when the stent was deployed approximately 5 mm from the distal side, the suture got stuck and failed to completely deploy the stent.The stent was removed from the patient partially deployed.Once the device was removed, the physician attempted to deploy the stent and the stent was able to be fully deployed outside the patient.The third ultraflex tracheobronchial stent (the subject of mfr report # 3005099803-2015-03218) was fully deployed inside the patient; however, the stent failed to completely expand.During removal, the distal tip of the delivery system got stuck within the stent and the stent came out together with the delivery system.The procedure was completed with another ultraflex tracheobronchial stent.It was reported that the patient experienced pneumonia.In the physician's assessment, the pneumonia occurred due to prolonged procedure time and not due to the stent issues.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX¿ TRACHEOBRONCHIAL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key5221390
MDR Text Key31072646
Report Number3005099803-2015-03218
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JCT
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K012883
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/20/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/29/2016
Device Model NumberM00564760
Device Catalogue Number6476
Device Lot Number0017410072
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/28/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/20/2015
Initial Date FDA Received11/13/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/07/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-