• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. ULTRA VERESS INSUFFLATION NEEDLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. ULTRA VERESS INSUFFLATION NEEDLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UV120
Device Problem Device Markings/Labelling Problem (2911)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Information asked for but unknown or not provided during initial contact.Information anticipated, but unavailable at this time.When additional information is received and/or the device analysis has been completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Week of (b)(6) 2015.
 
Event Description
It was reported that prior to an unknown laparoscopic procedure, the tyvek packaging of the device did not have any print on it.The device was not used in the procedure and the packaging was saved.The remaining devices in the sales unit were inspected and all other packaging was noted to be normal, without issue.Another device of the same product code and from the same sales unit was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse consequences for the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Tracking (b)(4).Result: upon visual inspection of the tyvek lid, it was confirmed that no variable or nonvariable print was present to verify product code or lot, but the tyvek had evidence that i had been sealed to a blister package of the proper size and shape, and indications were that it was most likely from a uv120 package.The mh2 machine that was used to package the uv120 requires two different printers.The multi-lane thermal transfer printer places the variable info that includes the lot number and the use by date.The gottcho printer places the non-variable info that includes the product code, description, and remaining details onto the tyvek lid.Both printers are in operation during production.The machine prints four each per cycle.Only one package with missing print has been reported.Quality inspection records were checked and no anomalies were noted.The product met all in-process and finished goods specs prior to release.Machine long books info were checked and no anomalies were noted during production of lot m4j049.Equipment testing was performed as part of the investigation.The equipment testing was able to create this defect when the top stock change and material splicing method is done in a specific way.The secondary root cause is human error; associate at sort failed to defect the blank tyvek.The lot records were reviewed: no protocols, defects, non-conformances or quarantine noted.The product met all in-process and finished goods specs upon release of the product.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRA VERESS INSUFFLATION NEEDLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo PR 00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC
475 calle c
guaynabo PR 00969
Manufacturer Contact
milton garrett
4545 creek road ml 120a
cincinnati, OH 45242
5133378865
MDR Report Key5223582
MDR Text Key31385500
Report Number3005075853-2015-07357
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HIF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K983925
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/04/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2020
Device Catalogue NumberUV120
Device Lot NumberM4J049
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/02/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/04/2015
Initial Date FDA Received11/13/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/18/2016
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/08/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-