• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-30
Device Problems Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings (1126); Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problems Seizures (2063); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Depression (2361)
Event Date 10/01/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a vns patient does not feel stimulation and has an increase in seizures and depression.The physician increased the patients settings from 1.75ma and 130us to 3.0ma and 500 us, and the patient still could not feel the stimulation.It was noted the patient's abilify was increased.The patient has been referred for full revision.Clinic notes from a visit on (b)(6) 2015 received for full revision referral were received which indicated that the physician stated the patient is not receiving current even after "doubling current and tripling pulsewidth" and suspects that the lead may not be attached to the nerve.It was reported that the patient does not feel the stimulation in normal or magnet mode and can feel an increase in feeling like seizures are coming on but is unsure if they actually occurred.Lead impedance and generator battery life were reported to be fine.The settings were reported to be increased current from 1.75ma with pulse width of 130us to 3.0ma with pulse width of 500us and she did not feel it at all and no voice change.The settings were set back to the original settings except the output and magnet current were increased.The patient is requesting that the generator pocket be moved at surgery because it is itchy.No additional relevant information has been received to-date.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.
 
Event Description
The generator and lead were explanted on (b)(6) 2015.Follow-up to the explant facility indicated that the facility does not keep any explants and they are discarded in surgery.
 
Event Description
An implant card was received indicating the reason for replacement as the device was ¿non functioning.¿ follow-up to the physician by the company representative revealed that the diagnostics on the device were reportedly good but due to the patient¿s symptoms and wish for a newer model the doctor decided to replace the lead and generator as the patient¿s previous lead would not be compatible with the newer model device.The patient was reported to be doing well after the surgery, and no trauma was noted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5232626
MDR Text Key31725410
Report Number1644487-2015-06477
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/21/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2002
Device Model Number300-30
Device Lot Number33130C
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/21/2015
Initial Date FDA Received11/18/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/06/2016
01/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/05/2000
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age27 YR
-
-