Method code: microscopic inspection.Conclusion: no failure detected, device out of specification.Asp investigation summary: the investigation included a review of the device history record (dhr), trending of the product malfunction codes and lot number, system risk analysis (sra) and return product evaluation: the dhr was reviewed and leaking cellblocks were detected during manufacturing, for which non-conformance was initiated for further investigation.Trending analysis for suspect positive bi by lot number involved was reviewed from 05/09/2015 to 11/05/2015 for product malfunction codes 'fluid leak' and 'skin/bone reaction' and trending was not exceeded.The suspect device was returned for evaluation.The reported event of leakage was confirmed.However, the nature of the leakage is uncharacteristic of manufacturing process.An inspection via a light microscope showed a rupture at the tip by the piercing zone with a smooth cutting surface in cell 4 close to the piercing zone.This kind of defect with some plastic sticking away from the cellblock cutting surface indicates that the damage was most likely caused by external impact after production.During the manufacturing process, the cellblocks are inspected visually and tested 100% in the vacuum chamber.All boxes used for internal transport of cellblocks are laid out with indicator paper to detect a possible leakage.The leakage caused by such damaged cells would have likely been noticed during manufacturing processes.The sra indicates the risk associated with the reported event is low with exposure to toxic or corrosive material and skin/bone reaction as 'moderate.' a field service engineer (fse) visited the site and found the unit involved to meet specifications.Fse also consulted/confirmed with the customer method for cassette insertion.A definitive assignable cause for the reported event is inconclusive.The issue will continue to be tracked and trended.
|