While it is unknown if the device used in this case caused or contributed to the patient's symptoms, it is possible as allergic reactions to dental materials are known and reported, with medical consequences being dependent upon the severity of the individual allergic response and subsequent exposure to the same material.Therefore, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.The device was not returned for evaluation and the lot number was not provided for retained-product testing and/or dhr review.
|
In this event a patient reported that they experienced an allergic reaction after undergoing a restorative procedure with integrity tempgrip as one of the materials.The patient stated they experienced irritation, swelling and "puffiness" on their gums in the area around the prepped tooth.The doctor prescribed chlorohexidine oral rinse, first mouth wash blm and nystpred.The patient stated that the reaction is now going away.The dentist was contacted and stated that they have asked the patient to undergo allergy testing and they were waiting to hear back from the patient.
|