Catalog Number 03.632.036 |
Device Problems
Material Fragmentation (1261); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/03/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information was not provided by reporter.(b)(4).Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation.(b)(6).A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
(b)(6) reported the following event: it was reported that during a lumbar fusion procedure, the matrix screwdriver was not properly holding the matrix screw.The matrix screwdriver is composed of a sleeve and shaft and the nurse had loaded the screw into the screwdriver assembly.When the surgeon attempted to insert the screw, it was discovered that the screwdriver assembly was not properly holding the screw due to the fact that the sleeve portion was chipped and worn.The case was successfully completed with another screwdriver without surgical delay or patient harm.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product investigation summary: the returned instrument was examined and the complaint condition was able to be confirmed as the distal threaded tip of the device was broken and missing a segment.A definitive root cause was unable to be determined; however, the failure mode is consistent with rough handling over the life of the instrument (4+ years).The holding sleeve is used in the matrix spine system for screw insertion with an appropriate driver.The returned instrument was examined and the complaint condition was able to be confirmed as the distal threaded tip of the device was broken and missing a segment (approximately 1.5mm).The relevant drawings for the sleeve were reviewed during the evaluation.A design change was implemented to address the failure mode of the thread tips breaking.The tip geometry on the inner sleeve was changed to a more constant outer diameter and the material of the outer sleeve changed from radel plastic to anodized titanium.The returned instrument was manufactured prior to the application of these changes as it was manufactured in march, 2011.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|