• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102R
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/27/2013
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During review of programming and diagnostic history, it was observed that the vns patient's device was tested during an office visit on (b)(6) 2013 and system diagnostic results revealed high impedance (dc dc -4).The device was tested again during an office visit on (b)(6) 2015 and system diagnostic results again showed a high impedance condition (dcdc - 7).No patient adverse events were reported.No known surgical interventions have occurred to date.No x-ray images can be obtained from the site.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had a generator replacement surgery.The surgeon had some difficulty removing the lead pin from the generator and no corrosion was observed.Additional information was received from the surgeon's office that during generator replacement surgery for this patient the doctor unscrewed the screws, and the lead usually just slides right out, but the top pin would not come out.The bottom pin looked like it would come right out, and did not appear to be stuck, like the top lead pin.The doctor then took the screw all the way out, and looking through the screw hole, was able to observe that the pin was in at a slight angle, so pulling the pin out directly was not working, and was keeping the lead from coming out.Therefore the doctor took a pair of blunt mosquito forceps and twisted and cracked the top part of the generator where the lead was inserted.When the generator was cracked, they were able to remove the lead.When they observed the lead pins after taking it out of the generator, the lead did not look bent at all, but looked perfectly fine.They replaced the generator with a new generator, inserted the lead and ran diagnostics several times, each time with a good outcome where the results were within normal limits, and lead impedance was ok.The nurse believed the poor diagnostics from the explanted generator was probably due to the connection between the lead pin and the generator due to the fact that the lead pin was so difficult to pull out.The device was discarded after surgery.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102R
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5242913
MDR Text Key32200557
Report Number1644487-2015-06507
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2014
Device Model Number102R
Device Lot Number202009
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/26/2015
Initial Date FDA Received11/23/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/29/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/25/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age50 YR
-
-