A company clinical analyst reviewed this complaint and stated the following: ¿the customer reported that they want the system checked due to chamber instability and a posterior capsule (pc) tear.The facility registered nurse confirmed the event occurred on the first case.The surgeon "felt like the pressure was unstable" during the cataract case, then towards the end he "felt like the pressure was shallowing" then a small pc tear occurred.An anterior vitrectomy was completed.Additional information has been requested but none has been received.The system operator¿s manual contains instructions for proper prime and setup.The system-graphical user interface also prompts the user through all of the steps required to prime and tune the phaco handpiece appropriately.The operators manual also states the following warning(s) and instructions on ¿good clinical practice¿ which dictates testing for adequate irrigation, aspiration flow, reflux, and operation as applicable for each handpiece prior to entering eye.Posterior capsule (pc) tear is a potential consequence of cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.Predisposition to pc tear or zonular dehiscence can be influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, congenital posterior lenticonus, posterior sub capsular (psc) cataract, poor visibility secondary to patients comorbidity [ie.Dense arcus, pterygium, band keratopathy, corneal scars, interstitial keratitis], poor microscope illumination [red reflex], ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, abnormally long or short axial lengths, pseudoexfoliation, zonular laxity, poor dilation, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (ifis), dense cataracts, asteroid hyalosis, or inadvertent patient movement.The conditions that increase the risk of pc tear during phacoemulsification include ergonomic obstacles, limited intraocular working space, poor visualization, increased nuclear size and density, weakened zonule, a radial tear in the capsulorhexis, and an inability to rotate the nucleus or epinucleus.These conditions may arise either because of the ocular anatomy, or because of surgical technique.There is no evidence contained within the reported information at this time that indicates that the design or performance of the system had any effect on the integrity of the posterior capsule.¿ product evaluation the system was examined.The company representative did not indicate finding any issues that would be associated with the reported event.The system was tested and found to meet product specifications.A review of the customer¿s complaint history for the last 24 months did not show any previous complaints of this kind against the system.The system was manufactured on october 28, 2013.Based on qa assessment, the product met specifications at the time of release.Posterior capsule tear is an issue that is occasionally reported with cataract surgery.However, a review of the complaint trends shows that the frequency reported is within known levels for this event.A root cause cannot be determined conclusively.(b)(4).
|