Model Number MICL13.7 |
Device Problems
Device Slipped (1584); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 08/11/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Method (process evaluation): work order search.Results (evaluation result): a lens work order search was performed and no similar complaints were found within the work order.Conclusion (unable to confirm complaint): based on the complaint history and work order search, a specific root cause of the event could not be determined.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The reporter stated the surgeon inserted a 13.7mm micl13.7 implantable collamer lens, -8.0 diopter and the lens "slid out" of the patient's eye.The backup lens was implanted.Additional information has been requested but none has been forthcoming.If additional information is received, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results (evaluation result): visual inspection of the returned product found a piece of one lens haptic torn off and missing.The lens was returned in liquid.Conclusion (unable to confirm complaint): based on the complaint history, work order search and evaluation of the returned product, a specific root cause of the event could not be determined.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Method: device history record review, medical review.Results: a review of the device history record was performed and nothing was found in the manufacturing and packaging processes of this lens that could be identified as the cause of the complaint.The cause of the lens to slip out of the eye, is possibly due to improper loading or handling practices in the operating room.Per medical review - reportedly, lens "slid out " of the eye requiring intraoperative lens exchange.No reported incision enlargement or any other tissue damage.The backup lens was successfully implanted.Given the information about the lens that slipped out of an eye it is very likely that user error (premature lens injection) have caused/contributed to the event.Conclusion: based on the complaint history, work order search, device history record review, medical review and the evaluation of the returned product, it is very likely that user error (premature lens injection) have caused/contributed to the event.(b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|