• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC XOMED INC. XPS® BLADE; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC XOMED INC. XPS® BLADE; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT Back to Search Results
Model Number 1884005
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/11/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not been received for evaluation.
 
Event Description
It was reported during an endoscopic sinus surgery,while using the silver bullet blade, it broke off mid use inside the patient.Follow-up with the customer reported the doctor noticed the tip of the blade broke off mid-use.The broken piece was retrieved from the patient.There was no patient impact or injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device returned to manufacturer: 01/11/2016.The device was received for product analysis.Condition upon receipt: 1 un-sealed sample, part number 1884005, from lot number 0 209773942 received; there was evidence of biological contaminants [based off of the reactivity with hydrogen peroxide].Equipment used: microscope (zeiss stemi 2000c between 0, 65 to 5, 0 magnification settings), calipers.Evaluation: when compared to the assembly drawing, visually the tip of the inner blade was broke off which would have resulted in the reported event.The tip was returned and measured 0.22¿ long.The break point corresponds to the first proximal valley of the inner blade tooth.When viewed under magnification, there was damage to the hubs that is consistent with improper loading - dimples on the front hub prior to the locking area caused by the handpiece locking mechanism; locking area damage caused by the back side of the front collet of the handpiece; and damage to the inner hub chevrons caused by the handpiece drive mechanism.The instructions for use has detailed instructions for properly loading a bur/blade into the handpiece.The improperly loaded blade may have contributed to the malfunction.The deformation of the break is consistent with the inner tip contacting the outer tip during use.For this break to occur, the tip would have to be deformed or become deformed and / or come in contact with an unapproved material.The most probable cause of the event is related to operational context.Method ¿ actual device evaluated; labeling evaluation; microscopic inspection.Results ¿ deformation problem; fracture problem.Conclusion ¿ operational context caused or contributed to event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XPS® BLADE
Type of Device
BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC XOMED INC.
6743 southpoint dr n
jacksonville FL 32216
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
6743 southpoint dr n
jacksonville FL 32216
Manufacturer Contact
charlotte ayala
6743 southpoint dr n
jacksonville, FL 32216
9043328372
MDR Report Key5267426
MDR Text Key32894343
Report Number1045254-2015-00410
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EQJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/23/2023
Device Model Number1884005
Device Catalogue Number1884005
Device Lot Number0209773942
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/11/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/04/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
01/12/2016
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/12/2016
09/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age00075 YR
Patient Weight65
-
-