• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number P-50 PL
Device Problem No Flow (2991)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/16/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: the product was returned for analysis.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.Results from the product history record review indicated the product met release criteria.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.Additional information has been requested.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A surgeon reported that no aqueous humor outflow was confirmed during a glaucoma filtration device surgery.The shunt was explanted and the procedure was converted to trabeculectomy in the same procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: customer suspected clogged shunt during implant procedure, shunt explanted, converted to trabeculectomy.This was a triple surgery involving a cataract surgery.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the product was released according to released criteria.The sample was returned for investigation.The lumen was found to be blocked therefore the complaint report is confirmed.Since the blockage was removed after cleaning the device, there is no indication for a manufacturing related factors that could cause the blockage and it seems that the blockage was formed after the product left the manufacturing plant.The root cause could not be conclusively determined since the blockage could have been caused by many different reasons during and after the clinical procedure.The blockage does not seem to be product related since after cleaning the device the blockage was removed.Therefore, there is no evidence for an inherent defect that might have caused the event.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
eddie darton, md, jd
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8175686660
MDR Report Key5279042
MDR Text Key33560210
Report Number3003701944-2015-00703
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/10/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Model NumberP-50 PL
Device Catalogue Number60053
Device Lot Number072376
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/01/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/18/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/09/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/08/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age76 YR
-
-