• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING Back to Search Results
Model Number D-1343-01-S
Device Problems Charred (1086); Kinked (1339); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problems Transient Ischemic Attack (2109); Heart Failure (2206)
Event Date 11/10/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because no lot number was provided by the customer.(b)(4).Biosense webster manufacturer's ref.No's (b)(4) are related to the same incident.(b)(4).Manufacturer's ref.No:(b)(4) the physician¿s opinion regarding the cause of this adverse event is that it was due to the ablation catheter.The generator was reported to have been operating per specifications and not responsible for the event.The generator was set to power control mode at 35 watts.Other parameters were unknown.Patient was not given anticoagulation therapy during the procedure.Multiple attempts have been made to obtain clarification to this complaint.However, no further information has been made available.The patient required extended hospitalization but it was not related to this event.Since this adverse event might result in permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure, this event is to be considered serious and mdr reportable.It was stated that the suspected device was the smart touch bidirectional catheter.Therefore, this event is being reported under this ablation catheter.The assessment has been made to also report this.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation (afib) using a smart touch bidirectional catheter and a lasso navigational variable eco catheter and suffered a transient ischemic attack and heart failure.During the ablation phase, the high temperature error was observed and ablation was interrupted.The physician removed the smart touch bidirectional catheter and noticed char on the tip.Catheter flushing was attempted with no irrigation outflow.It was then that the physician noticed a kink on the smart touch bidirectional catheter shaft near the handle.Catheter integrity remained intact with no internal parts exposed.There had been no difficulty removing this catheter from the patient.The smart touch bidirectional catheter was replaced and the issue was resolved.The procedure was continued.The issues of the char on the tip, catheter irrigation issue, kink and high temperature are all indicative of not reportable issues.Later in the procedure, ultrasound revealed a clot on the tip of the lasso navigational variable eco catheter.The physician believes that the patient may have suffered a stroke.Additional information was received noting that the patient remained sedated and on the ventilator until the late afternoon on the following day.The patient had gone into heart failure possibly secondary to the 3-5 liters of fluid received during the procedure.The patient was reported to wake up in the afternoon the following day and be in stable condition.The patient did not require medical or surgical intervention.There have been no reports of the patient exhibiting neurologic symptoms since the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation on 12/18/15.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation (afib) using a smart touch bidirectional catheter and a lasso navigational variable eco catheter.During the ablation phase, the high temperature error was observed and ablation was interrupted.The physician removed the smart touch bidirectional catheter and noticed char on the tip.Catheter flushing was attempted with no irrigation outflow.It was then that the physician noticed a kink on the smart touch bidirectional catheter shaft near the handle.Catheter integrity remained intact with no internal parts exposed.There had been no difficulty removing this catheter from the patient.The smart touch bidirectional catheter was replaced and the issue was resolved.The procedure was continued.Later in the procedure, ultrasound revealed a clot on the tip of the lasso navigational variable eco catheter.The physician believes that the patient may have suffered a stroke.Additional information was received noting that the patient remained sedated and on the ventilator until the late afternoon on the following day.The patient had gone into heart failure possibly secondary to the 3-5 liters of fluid received during the procedure.The patient was reported to wake up in the afternoon the following day and be in stable condition.The patient did not require medical or surgical intervention.There have been no reports of the patient exhibiting neurologic symptoms since the procedure.The returned device was visually inspected upon receipt and was found in normal conditions; no bents or sharp edges were observed that might have contributed to the complaint reported.The catheter outer diameters were measured and it was found within specifications.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The customer complaint cannot be confirmed.The root cause of the heart failure and thrombosis remains unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) states that careful catheter manipulation must be performed in order to avoid cardiac damage, perforation or tamponade.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX  32599
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
9497893837
MDR Report Key5287064
MDR Text Key33277416
Report Number9673241-2015-00900
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K113213
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberD-1343-01-S
Device Catalogue NumberD134301
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN_D-1343-01-S
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/11/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/10/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/28/2015
01/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
-
-