|
Model Number ICF100 |
Device Problem
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/18/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional investigation is underway.Additional information will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that an intra-arterial occlusion balloon leaked without rupture.Upon follow-up, it was reported that the leak was noted during cardioplegia delivery during a robotic mitral valve repair case.The balloon leak was identified by a low balloon pressure which measured 140mmhg, and the inability to completely arrest the heart.This occurred within minutes of balloon inflation.A second device was inserted within a couple of minutes and was used without issues.There was no evidence of balloon leak or damage during preparation, and no unique patient anatomy or calcification was noted.Upon removal of the first device, blood was observed within the balloon.There was no adverse patient outcome.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation summary: the device was received for evaluation, and the reported condition of balloon leak was not confirmed.The catheter balloon inflated concentric and remained inflated without leakage; however, traces of blood were noted inside the balloon.All lumens were found to be patent without evidence of leakage or occlusion.No other visual damage, contamination, or other abnormalities were found during the assessment of the device.The device will be sent to the supplier for additional testing, and findings will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation summary: the supplier evaluation revealed a balloon leak at the distal end of the catheter shaft, at the location of the pressure lumen.The leakage identified was caused by a bent cardioplegia seal mandrel.Additional manufacturer narrative: a supplier manufacturing defect was confirmed.This has been addressed with the supplier through investigation and corrective action has been initiated.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and showed that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.The ifu and training manuals were reviewed and no inadequacies were identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Trends will continue to be monitored through the use of edwards quality systems.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|