A surgeon reported that after a glaucoma filtering shunt was inserted, it was confirmed that there was "no flow" through the shunt.It was removed and another shunt was inserted, but again there was "no flow" confirmed.The second shunt was removed and the surgeon converted to a trabeculectomy only.There was no harm to the patient.Additional information was requested.There are two medical device reports associated with this event.This report is for the second shunt inserted and removed.
|
A customer reported that no aqueous humor outflow was confirmed after implanting a shunt to a patient's eye.The shunt was replaced with a second one, but the issue recurred.The device history records (dhrs) for the batches were reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the products were released according to release criteria.Two products were returned for analysis and the reported complaint was not observed in either of them: the shunts' lumens were found to be open.The shunts were visually inspected: shunt#1 was found to be proper and clean and there was no evidence of a malfunction of the product.The shunt¿s lumen appeared to be clear, with no blockage.In shunt#2 mild damages were seen on the external body of the shunt and unknown material which looks like a colorless fiber was seen through the port.The shunts' lumen was found open, however unknown material, consistent with the one seen through the port was seen on the side of the lumen.Indeed, after cleaning the device light passed through both sides of the restriction unit with no obstructions.The root cause could not be conclusively determined, no manufacturing or product failures were detected.(b)(4).
|