• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER X3 RIMFIT ID28 OD44; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER X3 RIMFIT ID28 OD44; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 63092844
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); Ambulation Difficulties (2544)
Event Date 10/01/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information has been requested and if received, will be provided in the supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Not available.
 
Event Description
Early loosening of the exeter rimfit cup was reported.The hospital used the rimcutter, and has experienced loosening.The loosening occurred at approximately one year post surgery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding cup loosening involving an exeter rimfit cup was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method and results: device evaluation and results: not performed as no items were returned.Medical records received and evaluation: the medical review indicated that several factors relating to surgical technique of cementation have been discussed and together have caused a problem with optimal placement of the cemented rimfit cup.Too much cement was left behind the cup resulting in a cement mantle that became too thick and caused thermal necrosis of the opposing bone which after slow resorption caused the cup to become loose.Because cementation technique is the responsibility of the surgeon, root cause of failure is procedure-related.There is no evidence of patient-related or device-related factors.Device history review: not performed as no lot code information was provided.Complaint history review: not performed as no lot code information was provided.Conclusions: the medical review indicated that several factors relating to surgical technique of cementation have caused a problem with optimal placement of the cemented rimfit cup.A thick cement mantle behind the cup caused thermal necrosis of the opposing bone which after slow resorption caused the cup to become loose.There was no evidence of patient-related or device-related factors.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and / or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Update: it should read: ¿(b)(6) hospital have used the exeter rimfit cup for 5 years, and have seen some early loosening of the cup.They approached me with this information, and have stopped using the exeter rimfit cup for the time being¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXETER X3 RIMFIT ID28 OD44
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NA
Manufacturer Contact
beverly lima
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5315941
MDR Text Key34038046
Report Number0002249697-2015-04428
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K111848
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number63092844
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/21/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/05/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-