On (b)(6) 2015, a gore acuseal vascular graft was successfully implanted with the intention to be used for the patient's dialysis.Unfortunately, the patient was not referred back to the physician despite an open wound over the graft (at releasing incision) for something like 6 weeks.On (b)(6) 2015, by the time the patient presented, there was approximately 2cm of exposed graft but no clinical signs of infection of the anastomoses.Therefore, given the patient's extensive co-morbidities and on discussion with the renal team, it was decided to manage the exposed graft conservatively with a negative pressure wound therapy (pico) and continue dialysis in the well-incorporated distal 10cm of graft.This was well controlled until a decision was made in the community (not by the surgeon) to stop applying the pico.Subsequently, control was lost at the local site and the physician made the decision to remove the gore acuseal vascular graft on (b)(6) 2015, and returned the patient to a tunneled neckline.
|