• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. AWL-DILATOR, TWINFIX ULTRA, 4.5MM; ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. AWL-DILATOR, TWINFIX ULTRA, 4.5MM; ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72202633
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/25/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
One twinfix ultra 4.5mm awl-dilator device was returned for evaluation of the reported complaint mode, ¿broken tip¿.The reported defect was confirmed.The awl dilator tip was broken at the start of the thread crest at the distal end of device; approximately.150¿ of device is missing.Visual damage was evident on the proximal tip of the handle; a ¿large depression¿ was found.The device appears to have been hit with excessive force, which may have caused the tip to fracture and break during use.Per the ifu (1060355) under precautions, ¿as with any surgical instrument careful attention should be exercised to ensure that excessive force is not placed on instrument.Excessive force can result in instrument failure.¿ the awl dilator shaft returned was verified to meet print dimensions, material specification, and required hardness.A review of the device history records was performed which confirmed no inconsistencies.There were no internal processing issues, which could have contributed to the nature of the complaint.A complaint history review has not identified additional complaints for this lot number on file.No further investigation is warranted at this time.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
During a rotator cuff repair it was reported that the doctor used the device for the second time and he could not get it to purchase.The surgeon had successfully used the awl for the first hole they were prepping for an anchor.The issue occurred while attempting to prep the second hole.The bone was very hard, and the surgeon may have twisted the awl to be at a different angle, while trying to get the awl to work.They were using a small mallet with the awl.The awl had been used previously in many cases.When the doctor put it on the back table, it was noticed the tip was broken off.It was recommended to take a metal anchor off of the shelf and use it in place of the tap device.The doctor pushed the piece of the awl dilator that broke further in, and kept the metal anchor in as well.The metal anchor was placed over the broken tip in the bone, and the procedure was completed successfully.There were no patient complications, and the patient was okay post-procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AWL-DILATOR, TWINFIX ULTRA, 4.5MM
Type of Device
ACCESSORIES,ARTHROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes boulevard
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes boulevard
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
james gonzales
150 minuteman road
andover, MA 01810
5123585706
MDR Report Key5318286
MDR Text Key34785917
Report Number1219602-2015-01263
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NBH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/25/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72202633
Device Lot Number50426398
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/07/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/25/2014
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/12/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-