(b)(6).The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device upn and lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.However, the complainant reported that the device was not expired.The complainant indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an advantage system device was used during a vaginal hysterectomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, the patient experienced urinary retention post operatively.Division of tape was done on (b)(6) 2015.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding the circumstances surrounding this event have been unsuccessful to date.Should additional relevant details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|