It was reported that a patient was having new implant surgery.The physician connected the lead and generator and got high impedance multiple times during system diagnostics.The physician then performed diagnostics with the test resistor, and high impedance was still present.The generator was then replaced, which resolved the issue.It was later mentioned that the set-screw may not have been backed out all the way, which could have prevented the lead pin and test resistor from inserting completely.The device history record was reviewed for the generator, and it conformed to all functional specifications prior to release.The generator has not been received to date.
|
The generator was received on (b)(4) 2016.Analysis was completed on 01/26/2016.Review of the data downloaded from the generator showed an indication of increased impedance on the date of surgery, (b)(6) 2015.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.The returned in-line test resistor showed no setscrew indention marks.However, the returned setscrew showed indention marks, indicating that the lead pin may have been secured at one time.Additional diagnostic tests were performed in an attempt to replicate the allegation of high impedance.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.
|