• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ) LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING Back to Search Results
Model Number D-1343-01-S
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Connection Problem (2900)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/23/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The bwi failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a lasso navigational variable eco catheter.Initially they were unable to pull out the cable.Finally the cable could be pulled out but the catheter was not recognized when it was reconnected.The issue was resolved by changing the catheter.The procedure was completed without patient consequence.Both these issues were assessed as not reportable as the most likely consequence was an intraprocedural delay.The potential that they could cause or contribute to a death or serious injury, or other significant adverse event, was remote.The biosense webster failure analysis lab discovered on december 3, 2015 that the distal sides of rings #19 and #20 were dented and slightly lifted with white plastic like material stuck underneath the rings.The physician did not feel any resistance while removing the catheter.There was no information reported that this condition was observed upon removal of the catheter.The sheath used was not known.Dislodgement of the foreign material inside the patient poses a risk of embolus.The rings being lifted if sharp or rough may cause damage to vascular endothelial linings during the withdrawal of the catheter and sheath.Therefore, this returned catheter condition has been assessed as a reportable malfunction.The awareness date has been reset to december 3, 2015.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) procedure with a lasso navigational variable eco catheter.They were unable to pull out the cable.Finally the cable could be pulled out but the catheter was not recognized when it was reconnected.The issue was resolved by changing the catheter.The procedure was completed without patient consequence.Upon receipt, the catheter was visually inspected and the distal sides of rings #19 and #20 were found dented and slightly lifted with white plastic like material stuck underneath.A fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (ft-ir) was performed in order to identify the type of foreign material under the rings.The results demonstrated that particle a was mainly composed of polyethylene (pe ) and a second compound corresponded to the barium sulfate a radiopacifier material widely used in the medical device industry; moving forward abs was identified a primary component for particle b.The catheter outer diameters were measured and it was found within specifications.The catheter was introduced in an instructions for use (ifu) recommended sheath and no resistance was noticed during this procedure.Further information received indicates that there was no resistance while introducing and removing the catheter.The catheter electrode condition was not noticed upon removing the catheter.The catheter was evaluated for eeprom, carto 3 and sensor functionality.The catheter was recognized by carto 3 system, no error messages were displayed and the catheter was properly visualized.Eeprom data demonstrates the catheter was properly calibrated during manufacturing.No problem was noticed while connecting the catheter during the test.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The customer complaint cannot be confirmed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LASSO® 2515 NAV ECO VARIABLE CATHETER
Type of Device
CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX  32599
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte #1820
parque industrial salvacar
juarez, chihuahua 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
9497893837
MDR Report Key5336708
MDR Text Key35257752
Report Number9673241-2015-00967
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K113213
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/27/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2018
Device Model NumberD-1343-01-S
Device Catalogue NumberD134301
Device Lot Number17268446L
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/03/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/26/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/30/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-