A peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient initially reported trouble draining and a recent hospital discharge.During follow up with patient's peritoneal dialysis registered nurse (pdrn), it was learned the patient was hospitalized from (b)(6) 2015 for no-growth peritonitis, per pdrn, the patient received a 14 day course of unknown antibiotics and is recovering.The pdrn stated there had been no break in aseptic techniques or compromise of sterile pathway prior to diagnosis of peritonitis.
|
The device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation and the failure mode cannot be confirmed.The complaint device lot number was not reported, however the sales and shipping records for the patient were reviewed for three months prior to the date of occurrence.No product was available from these lots in distribution centers to be analyzed, as the entirety of the lots have been sold and distributed.Device history review was performed on the potential related lots.No non-conformance reports or other abnormalities during the manufacturing process were found for these lots.The product involved met current specifications.In addition, the device record review confirmed the labeling, material, and process controls were within specification.The system level review of cycler device and concomitant products found no indication that the products caused or contributed in any way to the clinical event.
|