(b)(4).Should the information be provided later, a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Batch # l54l2g.Additional information requested but unavailable: what was meant by ¿device was defective¿? did the device deliver any staples? if yes, were the staples formed properly? if yes, was the staple line complete? did the device cut? if yes, was the cut line complete? on which firing(s) did this event occur (1st, 2nd, 12th, etc.)? what color cartridge was being used? was buttressing material utilized? if so, which product? were any unexpected noises heard? if so, when? were any of the forces higher or lower than expected (closing or opening)? can you please send the completed complaint form? the analysis results found that one sc60 device was returned in good visual condition and with no cartridge reload present.The device was noted to have the firing mechanism damaged.No functional test could be performed due to the condition of the device.The device was disassembled to verify the condition of the internal components and the firing shuttle was found to be damaged, not allowing the firing mechanism to properly function.While no conclusion could be reached as to how the firing shuttle became damaged; it should be noted that a 100% inspections takes place during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the require specifications prior to shipments, in addition, a sample of the batch is inspected at (b)(4).
|