|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Fever (1858); Pain (1994); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
|
Event Date 11/26/2013 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer did not receive devices, x-rays, or other source documents for review.Where lot numbers were received for the devices, the device history records were reviewed and found to be conforming.A cause for this specific event cannot be ascertained from the information provided.Should additional information become available and an investigation result be available, that changes this assessment, an amended medical device report will be submitted.Zimmer's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient was implanted a biolox delta head, 12/14, 32 x 0 on (b)(6) 2013.The patient was hospitalized on (b)(6) 2013 due to the hip pain, fever and increase in crp.Septic arteritis was diagnosed and on (b)(6) 2013 the patient underwent a revision surgery for removal and reinsertion of ceramic head and acetabular liner.Dr.(b)(6) evaluated that this serious adverse event was not related to the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As per fda¿s directive, medwatch report has been resubmitted for correcting the mfr number from 9631550-2016-00054-001 to 9613350-2016-00054-001.All the information captured as per 9631550-2016-00054-001 including g4(date received by manufacturer) except b4.Additional: h2.Update: g4, g7, h6, h10.The device manufacturing quality records indicate that the released components met all requirements to perform as intended.No trend is identified.The compatibility check could not be performed as only one product was reported to us.The product compatibility check is not relevant for one product only.Review of incoming information: it is reported that patient received a biolox delta head and unknown liner on (b)(6)2013.And were revised on (b)(6)2013 due to infection (septic arteritis).No x-rays, pictures, surgical notes or other documents were provided for review.No product was available for investigation.Root cause analysis: the gamma sterilization specification of the device certifies the suitability of sterilization.The irradiation certificate of the affected.Lot has been reviewed and was found to be according to specification.Therefore, it can be excluded that an unsterile device caused the infection.Moreover, no trend on infection has been observed for this product family.Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a disadvantageous product design favored or contributed to the infection.However, the appropriate ifu for endoprosthesis states that "early or late infections" are "possible consequences of an implant" and should be considered when implanting zimmer biomet devices.However, all possible causes related to the issues reported are listed in the appropriate dfmea.Based on the given information and the results of the investigation, the complaint could not be confirmed as the alleged failure could not be identified or reproduced.Zimmer's reference number of this file is (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was implanted on right side and revised due to pain, fever and increase in crp.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|