• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDIVATORS ADVANTAGE PLUS; AUTOMATED ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDIVATORS ADVANTAGE PLUS; AUTOMATED ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number ADVANTAGE PLUS
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem Exposure to Body Fluids (1745)
Event Date 12/21/2015
Event Type  No Answer Provided  
Manufacturer Narrative
The facility reported potential problems associated with reprocessing endoscopes in their advantage plus automated endoscope reprocessor (aer): an endoscope with a visible leak during the precleaning passed the leak test of the aer, a piece of dry debris came out of a scope during a procedure when the suction was applied, and an endoscope with a forceps left inside the channel passed the reprocessing cycle without errors.Improper or inadequate reprocessing of endoscopes could lead to potential patient cross-contamination.Medivators technical service spoke with the facility and advised on each of the issues.A small leak in a scope can be sealed off depending on the articulation of the distal tip and how the scope is placed into the aer.If the leak is pinched closed when the scope is put into the basin, the machine may not detect it.The instructions for use state to leak test endoscopes prior to disinfection in the aer.Manual cleaning of the endoscope must be performed before reprocessing in the aer and is critical to the removal ot physical debris in the scope channels.Proper cleaning, including brushing and flushing, will remove debris from the channels.Depending on the internal architecture of the endoscope, if hookup connectors are not placed securely on the scope, no error may be generated during the blockage check with the forceps still in the channel.Since the initial report, there has been no further contact from this facility regarding their aer.There is no known patient illness or injury.This complaint will continue to be monitored in the medivators complaint handling system.
 
Event Description
The facility reported potential problems associated with reprocessing endoscopes in their advantage plus automated endoscope reprocessor (aer): an endoscope with a visible leak during the precleaning passed the leak test of the aer, a piece of dry debris came out of a scope during a procedure when the suction was applied, and an endoscope with a forceps left inside the channel passed the reprocessing cycle without errors.Improper or inadequate reprocessing of endoscopes could lead to potential patient cross-contamination.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ADVANTAGE PLUS
Type of Device
AUTOMATED ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDIVATORS
14605 28th ave n
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDIVATORS
14605 28th ave n
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer Contact
kristin bergeson
14605 28th ave n
minneapolis, MN 55447
MDR Report Key5377778
MDR Text Key36338293
Report Number2150060-2016-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FEB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K082988
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Notification
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/18/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator No Information
Device Model NumberADVANTAGE PLUS
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/21/2015
Initial Date FDA Received01/19/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/29/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-