• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CENTURION VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER CENTURION VISION SYSTEM; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8065751763
Device Problem Air Leak (1008)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product samples have been received and are awaiting evaluation.Investigation, including root cause analysis, is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A surgeon reported inability to build vacuum as well as bubbles in the aspiration line "specially during the phaco portion" of an unknown quantity of cataract procedures.Additional information was requested for this report.Upon follow up it was informed that the procedures were completed without replacing the products and without harm to the patients.Product samples were requested for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Six wet and used cassette samples were returned in trays for this complaint.Two of the six samples were randomly selected for visual and functional testing.The drain bags were detached from the cassette covers due to saturation.Both of the tested samples could be recognized and the service data could be retrieved from the console.The samples primed and tuned successfully; however, leakage occurred between the aspiration luers and the handpiece during the tuning process.The cavity of the aspiration fitting was 3 on both samples.The aspiration fittings were replaced with lab aspiration fittings and the tuning process was repeated.No leakage was observed during the re-tuning of the samples.Both samples were able to reach a maximum vacuum within specification.The irrigation and aspiration flow rates were within specification.No drops presented from the irrigation luers after the irrigation off 5 seconds.Neither leakage, nor occlusion was detected from the tubing insertion to the fittings and the four aspiration ports on the pump region of the cassette bases.Although the samples were able to reach maximum vacuum with no issues, leakage form the blue aspiration luer was observed on the returned samples.It has been determined that some of the blue luers from one of the six supplier cavities (cavity 3) from one supplier lot can allow air to enter the aspiration line and reduce the ability of the sample to reach maximum vacuum.An internal investigation has been opened to address reports of a similar nature.In regards to the console, no further information was able to be obtained from this customer.With no additional, related information provided, the customers reported event was not able to be confirmed.A phaco handpiece was received for evaluation.A device history record shows that the product met specifications at the time of release.A visual assessment of the returned sample found no visual defects.A full functional test was then performed on the returned handpiece.The handpiece was first tested on a ground resistance tester in which it passed and the handpiece was then connected to a calibrated system for priming and tuning.The handpiece was found to pass all functional testing on the system and was then tested on the dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke testing on both ultrasound and torsional movements.Functionally the handpiece passes all tests.The phaco handpiece was found to meet specifications.Therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned samples for the lots associated with the customer's report were visually and functionally tested and passed testing.The samples were able to reach a maximum vacuum within specification.The aspiration fitting cavity was found to be cavity 3.No leakage was observed at the blue aspiration luer.A device history record shows that product met specifications at the time of the release.The root cause of the customer's complaint could not be established as the returned sample met specifications.An internal investigation has been opened to address reports of a similar nature.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CENTURION VISION SYSTEM
Type of Device
UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. - IRVINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER
15800 alton parkway
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
eddie darton, md, jd
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8175686660
MDR Report Key5407779
MDR Text Key37748315
Report Number2028159-2016-00465
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K121555
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/10/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8065751763
Other Device ID Number02.01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/26/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/14/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/03/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/19/2016
05/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/27/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-