• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTERSECT ENT PROPEL MINI SINUS IMPLANT; DRUG ELUTING STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTERSECT ENT PROPEL MINI SINUS IMPLANT; DRUG ELUTING STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 60011
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Perforation (2001)
Event Date 12/10/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The propel mini sinus implant is intended for use in patients 18 years of age or greater following ethmoid sinus surgery to maintain patency, thereby reducing the need for post-operative intervention such as surgical adhesion lysis and/or use of oral steroids.The propel mini sinus implant separates mucosal tissues, provides stabilization of the middle turbinate, prevents obstruction by adhesions, and reduces edema.During the investigation, the physician's opinion was that because the patient did not have middle turbinates due to prior surgeries, this resulted in the implants sitting against the septum leading to septal perforation due to pressure necrosis through mucosa and cartilage.The radial force exerted by the implant is orders of magnitude smaller than the force required to produce fractures in the nasal septum (lee m, et.Al.Ohns (2010) 143, 784-788).The radial force decreases over time and there are no sharp edges to be pushed into/through the septum.Additionally, based on the company's evaluation and consistent with the reported information from the physician, there does not appear to be any device malfunction.Thus, it is highly unlikely that the implants caused or contributed to the septal perforation in this case.Given this patient's history of chronic sinusitis with persisting nasal polyposis and multiple prior sinus surgeries, it is more likely that the septal perforation resulted from surgical trauma, chronic obstructive polyposis, or the chronic use of topical nasal corticosteroids sprays.However, in the opinion of the treating physician, the device contributed to the adverse event, thus intersect ent is reporting this event out of an abundance of caution.The following is being provided as this device is a combination product: name: propel; dose, frequency & route used: (1) 370 ug implant; diagnosis for use: sinus surgery.Combination product -yes.
 
Event Description
The patient underwent a revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ess) on (b)(6) 2015; sinus implants were placed bilaterally in the ethmoid sinuses.During a post-surgical follow-up visit on (b)(6) 2015, the physician reported a posterior septal perforation apparent near the deployed implants.The physician reported on (b)(6) 2015 that no intervention was required at this time; she plans to monitor/observe the perforation.(as implants were placed bilaterally, the manufacturer is filing a report for each: please refer to mfr # 3010101669-2016-00001 for report on the other implant).
 
Event Description
The patient underwent a revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ess) on (b)(6) 2015; sinus implants were placed bilaterally in the ethmoid sinuses.During a post-surgical follow-up visit on (b)(6) 2015 the physician reported a posterior septal perforation apparent near the deployed implants.The physician reported on (b)(6) 2015 that no intervention was required at this time; she plans to monitor/observe the perforation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROPEL MINI SINUS IMPLANT
Type of Device
DRUG ELUTING STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTERSECT ENT
menlo park CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTERSECT ENT
1555 adams dr
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer Contact
amy wolbeck
1555 adams dr
menlo park, CA 94025
6506412115
MDR Report Key5411863
MDR Text Key37535624
Report Number3010101669-2016-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100044
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date11/26/2016
Device Model Number60011
Device Catalogue Number60011
Device Lot Number50526001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/10/2015
Initial Date FDA Received02/04/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/26/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured05/26/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Disability;
Patient Age50 YR
-
-