Though no medical/surgical intervention was required to preclude a serious injury in this event, there have been previously reported events involving a similar device that resulted in the need for medical/surgical intervention to preclude permanent damage to a body structure or permanent impairment of a body function.Therefore, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.As received, the handpiece could support the reported complaint.However, a root cause could not be determined.Cut testing with the handpiece could not be performed as the handpiece stalled immediately when bur was introduced into cut test material.The handpiece was then microscopically evaluated by quality personnel.Significant debris was noted inside cap and head cavities.Some rubbing marks were seen within the head cavity.Some damage to the rotor blades was also observed.Microscopic evaluation also revealed significant wear on the rotor.The threads and depth of both the cap and the head of the returned handpiece were measured by manufacturing personnel.All dimensions were found to be within specification.The combination of debris, friction between parts, and instability of the set due to a cap end bearing failure are most likely responsible for the complaint.In addition, all components looked dry and corroded with no sign of lubrication.
|