• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS - HOUSTON LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS - HOUSTON LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Break (1069); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 01/13/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
It was reported during prophylactic generator replacement, the surgeon found the lead wiring out of the tubing.When the surgeon went to remove the generator from the pocket the lead broke in half.It was reported that device diagnostics prior to generator replacement were within normal limits.The explanted generator and lead were received for analysis.Analysis of the generator was completed on 02/08/2016.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The battery shows an ifi=no condition.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Analysis of the lead was completed on 02/02/2016.Note that the electrodes were not returned for analysis; therefore a complete evaluation could not be performed on the entire lead product.During the visual analysis of the returned lead portions the quadfilar coils did not appeared to be broken and abraded openings were not observed on the outer or inner silicone tubes.Slice marks were observed in various areas on the outer silicone tubing.The slice marks found on the outer silicone tubing and the cut ends that were made during the explanted process, most likely provided the leakage path for the dried remnants of what appeared to have once been body fluids found inside the outer silicone tubing.What appeared to be white deposits were observed in various locations.The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the connector pin provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, with no discontinuities identified.Based on the analysis results of the lead, it is likely that the damage to the lead occurred as a result of the surgery; however, attempts to obtain additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5432331
MDR Text Key38784758
Report Number1644487-2016-00287
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/13/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/29/2008
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number929
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/13/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/11/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/09/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age14 YR
-
-