Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence, should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information of conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
According to the information received from patient's legal representation alleges that on or about (b)(6) 2014, a virtue sling was implanted in patient.Immediately following the surgery, plaintiff began experiencing severe pain in the area where the virtue device was implanted.Plaintiff also began experiencing severe pain in areas surrounding the virtue, including the scrotum and groin area.Following the implantation of the virtue device, plaintiff's urinary incontinence worsened.In addition, plaintiff now experiences pain while urinating and inability to completely his bladder, and severe nocturnal leakage.Following the implantation of the virtue device, plaintiff began experiencing severe sexual side effects, including pain, difficulty achieving and maintaining an erection, and severe issues related to climax.In an attempt to relieve the pain and discomfort caused by the virtue device, plaintiff has been prescribed pain medication treatment, which has been unsuccessful.Plaintiff has also undergone physical therapy.This treatment has been unsuccessful in relieving plaintiff's pain.
|