• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP; DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problems High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension (1908); Pain (1994); Tachycardia (2095); Brain Injury (2219); Increased Respiratory Rate (2486); Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Date 12/13/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Burns second degree/ burn at lumbar region/ large lesions/ blisters [burns second degree], applies lumbar band/ wears a dry suit diving [intentional device misuse].Case description: this is a spontaneous report from a contactable physician received by pfizer via a lawyer.A (b)(6) male patient of an unspecified ethnicity started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare lower back & hip), via an unspecified route of administration on (b)(6) 2015 for lower back pain.Medical history included hypertension treated with aprovel.The patient's concomitant medications were not reported.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient applied lumbar band of thermacare, then wore a dry suit and went diving.After 15 minutes of diving and 5 hours from the application of thermacare, the patient complains in correspondence of the heating lumbar band, a sudden burning and unbearable pain.The patient tries to rise to the surface as quickly as possible, but he must comply with decompression in order to avoid serious damage.As soon as he arrives at the dive center, the patient removes the band of thermacare, which is perfectly intact and dry, but on his back in the application site there are large lesions.The patient went to the hospital, had sterile gauze applied to the burn site, and suggested to visit another specialized center due the presence of burn.At another emergency room of another hospital on (b)(6) 2015, the patient was assessed: alert, eupneic, currently controlled pain, pain value 5, heart rate 90, respiratory rate 16, glasgow coma scale 15, and blood pressure 150/80.The summary of general plastic surgery visit reports: second-degree burn to the back lumbar region and blisters.Therapeutic measures taken in response to event included application of betadine, gauze and tachipirina 1000mg 1 tablet every 8 hours for pain.The patient left the hospital on the same day, (b)(6) 2015 and returned on (b)(6) 2015 for treatment.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was permanently withdrawn on (b)(6) 2015.The outcome of the event was unknown.No follow-up attempts possible.No further information expected.
 
Event Description
Event verbatim [preferred term] burns second degree/ burn at lumbar region/ large lesions/ blisters [burns second degree], applies lumbar band/ wears a dry suit diving [intentional device misuse].Case narrative:this is a spontaneous report from a contactable physician received by pfizer via a lawyer.A 51-year-old male patient started to receive thermacare heatwrap (thermacare lower back & hip), via an unspecified route of administration on (b)(6) 2015 for lower back pain.Medical history included hypertension treated with irbesartan (aprovel).The patient's concomitant medications were not reported.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient applied lumbar band of thermacare, then wore a dry suit and went diving.After 15 minutes of diving and 5 hours from the application of thermacare, the patient complains in correspondence of the heating lumbar band, a sudden burning and unbearable pain on his lower back which was directly in contact with the wrap.The patient tries to rise to the surface as quickly as possible, but he must comply with decompression in order to avoid serious damage.As soon as he arrives at the dive center, the patient removes the band of thermacare, which is perfectly intact and dry, but on his back in the application site there are large lesions.The patient went to the hospital, had sterile gauze applied to the burn site, and suggested to visit another specialized center due the presence of burn.At another emergency room of another hospital on (b)(6) 2015, the patient was assessed: alert, eupneic, currently controlled pain, pain value 5, heart rate 90, respiratory rate 16, glasgow coma scale 15, and blood pressure 150/80.The summary of general plastic surgery visit reports: second-degree burn to the back lumbar region and blisters.Therapeutic measures taken in response to event included application of betadine, gauze and tachipirina 1000mg 1 tablet every 8 hours for pain.The patient left the hospital on the same day, (b)(6) 2015 and returned on (b)(6) 2015 for treatment.The action taken in response to the event for thermacare heatwrap was permanently withdrawn on (b)(6) 2015.The outcome of the event was unknown.Product quality complaints provided the following information: there was no reasonable suggestion of device malfunction.No sample was received at the site.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass wrap/patch/pad too hot.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Final confirmation status: not confirmed.No follow-up attempts possible.No further information expected.Follow-up (17feb2020): new information received from product quality complaints includes: investigation results.No follow-up attempts needed.No further information expected.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no reasonable suggestion of device malfunction.No sample was received at the site.This investigation was conducted for an unknown lot number lower back/hip (lbh) product.The root cause category is non-assignable (complaint not confirmed as a quality defect).There was limited device specific information provided, no batch number or return sample was available for evaluation.Without a batch reference number and/or return sample a manufacturing and technical evaluation cannot be completed for the wrap involved in this case.There is not a product quality related trend identified for the subclass wrap/patch/pad too hot.The manufacturing operations employ quality control procedures which include in process testing, thermal testing and visual inspection, to ensure the quality of the product being packaged.Final confirmation status: not confirmed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERMACARE LOWER BACK & HIP
Type of Device
DISPOSABLE PACK, HOT
Manufacturer (Section D)
PFIZER CONSUMER HEALTH CARE
1231 wyandotte drive
albany GA 31705
MDR Report Key5445344
MDR Text Key38632938
Report Number1066015-2016-00023
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K953442
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/27/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/18/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/27/2016
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/03/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-