• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS PULSE GEN MODEL 102; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Syncope (1610); Bradycardia (1751); Headache (1880); Nausea (1970); Loss of consciousness (2418); Chest Tightness/Pressure (2463)
Event Date 11/25/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported through an article that a patient with a vns for refractory depression presented with bradycardia and orthostasis 9 years after initial implant of the vns.This was reported by the patient as recurrent syncopal episodes occurring for duration of 1 month.The patient reported 3 - 5 syncopal episodes occurring every other day, with loss of consciousness lasting 5 - 7 minutes.These episodes were preceded by lightheadedness, shortness of breath, nausea, and chest pressure radiating to her left arm and the patient also denied any triggers.The patient also denied loss of consciousness, which contradicts the initial report.The patient's past medical history was notable for anxiety and bipolar disorder associated with severe refractory depression.Over her lifetime, she had been treated with multiple lines of medication and over 70 documented electroconvulsive therapy treatments.Upon the patient's admission, her vital signs were within normal limits, cardiac examination was unremarkable, cardiac evaluation including measurement of cardiac enzymes and 2-dimensional echo were all within normal limits.Serial ekgs were significant only for occasional sinus bradycardia in the low 50s.Urine drug screening was negative and the ct was normal.Records from an outside hospitalization a month prior for these same symptoms demonstrated a normal ct angiogram of the head and neck, normal continuous eeg monitor, and continuous telemetry without arrhythmias.During the first half of admission, the patient's blood pressures fluctuated significantly.These findings were note despite having been adequately hydrated with crystalloid solution prior to the assessments.Additionally, a complete neurologic exam and workup had been unremarkable and her medications were reviewed and deemed non-contributory.As a result, a decision was made to inactivate the vns.Variation in systolic and diastolic blood pressures diminished in a statistically significant manner after the vns was inactivated.The patient also endorsed improvement of her symptoms.The patient was then deemed stable and discharged.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5446594
MDR Text Key38558839
Report Number1644487-2016-00350
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/20/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number102
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/20/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/19/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
-
-