• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA AMISTEM H, HA COATED STEM SIZE 5 STD; FEMORAL STEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA AMISTEM H, HA COATED STEM SIZE 5 STD; FEMORAL STEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 01.18.135
Device Problem Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problem Bone Fracture(s) (1870)
Event Date 01/22/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Batch review performed on 16 february 2016: (b)(4).On 19 feb 2016 the medical affairs director made the following analysis: according to report, the surgeon asked for a dimensional verification of the stem dimensions, because he surmised that the difficulties he had to drive the stem down were due to a dimensional problem.This is a technical aspect, which will be investigated technically on the returned device.Clinically speaking, several situations could lead to the described contingency without requiring a real dimensional mismatch, such as insufficient penetration of the broach (according to report, trial reduction with broach and trial head was not performed), inaccurate rotational positioning of the final stem versus broached cavity, varus or valgus positioning of the stem.Of course none of these possible situations can be verified.For this reason, the clinical investigation cannot be expected to draw any conclusion.
 
Event Description
The surgeon implanted an amistem-h # 5 and he noticed that protruded of 1 cm.He decided to remove it causing the femur fracture.The fracture was then treated with a cerclage and replacing the stem with a cemented amistem.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 23 march 2016 the (b)(4) project manager analysed the returned implants.Observing the femoral stem some scratches can be noted, also on the neck: such signs was probably caused during the removal phase.The ha on the surface of the stem is almost totally present.On the femoral head some signs can be seen probably caused during the removal phase.The stem will be dimensionally analyzed by the cq department.With the information we have till now, it is not possible to determine the root cause of the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 20 april 2016 the quality control manager performed a metrological analysis of the stem involved in this complaint and commented as follows: the documental investigation confirms that the device has been produced according to the specification valid at the time of manufacturing.On 20 april 2016 it was prepared a final report with the information submitted in this report and in the previous ones.On 20 may 2016 the report was sent to the initial reporter and the case was closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMISTEM H, HA COATED STEM SIZE 5 STD
Type of Device
FEMORAL STEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA
strada regina
castel san pietro, 6874
SZ  6874
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDACTA INTERNATIONAL SA
strada regina
castel san pietro, 6874
SZ   6874
Manufacturer Contact
stefano baj
strada regina
castel san pietro, 6874
SZ   6874
91 6966060
MDR Report Key5446939
MDR Text Key38557309
Report Number3005180920-2016-00055
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K093944
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/20/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/21/2020
Device Catalogue Number01.18.135
Device Lot Number153128
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/23/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/22/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/19/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/24/2016
05/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/09/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
-
-