During review of the manufacturer¿s in-house programming database, it was identified that a programming anomaly occurred sometime between (b)(6) 2014 and (b)(6) 2015.On (b)(6) 2014, the device was interrogated at intended settings.There is no diagnostic history available for this date.On the next recorded visit dated (b)(6) 2015, the first interrogation the settings were found to be at unintended parameters that were indicative of faulted system diagnostic tests.Upon follow-up with the treating physician, the physician reported that when he checked the patient¿s device in (b)(6) 2015, he remembers that there appeared to be an ¿electric zap¿ (i.E.Jolting/painful sensation) which scared both the patient and physician.The jolting sensation had stopped on that visit but it did scare her so she¿s reluctant to let him check her device too often.The last couple of times, he has not checked her device but the physician reports that she seems to be doing very well.He reports that he believes he is the only person that would have checked the patient's device around that time.The findings from the programming history were explained to the physician, and the physician expressed understanding.
|