• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 625-0T-36G
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Swelling (2091); Injury (2348)
Event Date 01/26/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
The sales representative reported on behalf of the surgeon that the patient, who had initially presented with pain and swelling in the groin, underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2016.The patient had been implanted with an exeter stem, trident cup, ceramic liner and alumina head in approximately 2005 by a surgeon who since retired.The new surgeon initially suspected when the patient presented with symptoms that there may have been an issue with ceramic head and as such he carried out an anterior pelvic exploration and pseudo tumour debridement.On exploration it became apparent that the cup was too large for the patient's anatomy and had been rubbing against the patients tendon, causing the swelling.As such the surgeon went in posteriorly to carry out the revision.All devices were explanted successfully.The surgeon commented after the devices had been removed that there did not appear to be anything wrong with the ceramic and there appeared to be corrosion on the trunnion of the stem.The representative was in the case and commented that the trunnion looked worn, although he did not observe any corrosion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding altr (psuedotumour) involving an trident liner was reported.Altr could not be confirmed as medical records were not provided.Method and results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar), images of the device are included in the mar.""the proximal and articulating surfaces of the insert were inspected.The outer rim of the insert with debris was also being observed" a material analysis concluded: "no material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined." medical records received and evaluation: a medical review was not performed because insufficient information was provided.Device history review: review indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: review indicated there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusions: a material analysis was performed and concluded that " no material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined." the exact cause of the event however could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information, including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes and serial x-rays are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available investigation will be re-opened.
 
Event Description
The sales representative reported on behalf of the surgeon that the patient, who had initially presented with pain and swelling in the groin, underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2016.The patient had been implanted with an exeter stem, trident cup, ceramic liner and alumina head in approximately 2005 by a surgeon who since retired.The new surgeon initially suspected when the patient presented with symptoms that there may have been an issue with ceramic head and as such he carried out an anterior pelvic exploration and pseudo tumour debridement.On exploration it became apparent that the cup was too large for the patient's anatomy and had been rubbing against the patients tendon, causing the swelling.As such the surgeon went in posteriorly to carry out the revision.All devices were explanted successfully.The surgeon commented after the devices had been removed that there did not appear to be anything wrong with the ceramic and there appeared to be corrosion on the trunnion of the stem.The representative was in the case and commented that the trunnion looked worn, although he did not observe any corrosion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIDENT ALUMINA INSERT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
Manufacturer Contact
cindy chuhinko
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5452065
MDR Text Key38744781
Report Number0002249697-2016-00495
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGB
PMA/PMN Number
P000013
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/31/2013
Device Catalogue Number625-0T-36G
Device Lot Number26222002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/21/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/26/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/22/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/03/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/13/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-