Product evaluation: the product was returned for analysis, haptic and optic damage was observed.Solution was observed on the returned product.Results from the product history record review indicated the product met release criteria.Additional information was provided, which indicated an approved cartridge was used with a handpiece.Not enough information was provided to conduct a review on the cartridge lot.Based on our observation it can be reasonably concluded that the damage is not manufacturing related.Due to the presence of surgical solution and the condition of the returned sample, the damage is most likely related to customer handling.
|