• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION SPECTRA®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION SPECTRA®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number SC-2316-70
Device Problems Bent (1059); Break (1069); Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291); Kinked (1339)
Patient Problem Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Date 01/07/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: model#: sc-2316-50 serial#: (b)(4) description: infinion1x16 perc lead kit-50 cm model#: sc-3400-30 serial#: (b)(4) description: infinion splitter 2x8 kit (30 cm).
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient has several contacts on both leads that were measuring high impedances.Database analysis on impedance measurements revealed eleven contacts with high values on port ab.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the leads and splitters were replaced.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluation indicated that the complaint had been confirmed.Visual (microscope) and x-ray inspection of the lead revealed that multiple cables were completely broken at the bent/kinked location of the lead.The bent/kinked location is 1 cm from the set screw mark of the clik anchor.There were no exposed cables at the clik site fracture locations.The broken cables resulted in the reported complaint of high impedance.Sc-2316-70, (b)(4): device evaluation indicated that the complaint had been confirmed.Impedance tests confirmed the complaint.High impedance readings were registered at contacts 6 and 11.External visual inspection of the lead found that the lead proximal end was fractured between contacts # 10 and 11.X-ray inspection revealed broken cables located between contacts number 10 and 11.No cables were exposed at the fracture site.The dhr review found no anomalies when the lead was manufactured.(b)(4): device evaluation indicated that the complaint was not verified.A test infinion lead was inserted into the splitter connector without any anomalies.Device exhibited normal device characteristics.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient has several contacts on both leads that were measuring high impedances.Database analysis on impedance measurements revealed eleven contacts with high values on port ab.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the leads and splitters were replaced.The patient was doing well postoperatively.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISION SPECTRA®
Type of Device
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
talar tahmasian
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
6619494863
MDR Report Key5461877
MDR Text Key39079081
Report Number3006630150-2016-00408
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
030017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2014
Device Model NumberSC-2316-70
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/17/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/01/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/25/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/06/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age36 YR
-
-