• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305U
Device Problem Material Perforation (2205)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/20/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately two years, six months post implant of this bioprosthetic valve, this valve was explanted and replaced due to a perforated leaflet in the right coronary cusp of the valve.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic received additional information that the patient presented with exertional shortness of breath and was found to have congestive heart failure and severe aortic insufficiency prior to this valve replacement.The product has not been returned to medtronic for analysis, and without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the returned product specimen was visually examined.The stent posts appeared slightly deflected.All leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible except where host tissue extends on the inflow.Tears and abrasions in all leaflets through the free margin and/or the lunula appeared to be due to contact with the bias cloth along the inner outflow rail or stent posts adjacent to all cusps.A tear along the lunula of the left cusp appeared to have increased in size during explant.All commissures appeared intact.Glistening off-white pannus remained attached to the existing sewing ring on the inflow adjacent to the non-coronary cusp extending along the tissue and base stitching, into all inferior coaptive areas, and 1 to 3 mm onto all cusps.Remnants of pannus were observed on the outflow and an unknown amount of pannus appeared to have been removed on the inflow and outflow during explant.Radiography showed no evidence of mineralization in the valve and/or host tissue.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Based on the received information and the returned product analysis, the reported regurgitation is most likely due to the cuspal tear/abrasion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5463740
MDR Text Key39145587
Report Number2025587-2016-00245
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/24/2018
Device Model Number305U
Device Catalogue Number305U223
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/08/2016
Initial Date FDA Received02/26/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
09/26/2016
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/02/2016
09/29/2016
09/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/17/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00074 YR
-
-