The reason for this complaint was to report that the inserter stripped out of the cup and the surgeon removed the cup insert and replaced it.The healthcare professional indicated there was a significant adverse event to the patient.There was a 15 minute delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device has not made available to djo surgical for examination.The lot number or revision level were not reported, therefore this instrument could not be linked to a specific device history record (dhr) or the actual date of manufacture could not be determined with confidence.A review of the product complaint report history showed previous complaints but there were no indications that patients were at risk, or that this instrument has a design or material deficiency.Summary of complaints: (b)(4) functional, (b)(4) dull/worn, (b)(4) locking mechanism damaged, (b)(4) threads damaged/galled, (b)(4) missing feature, (b)(4) missing component, (b)(4) broke/cracked/damaged, (b)(4) hardware missing/lost.The root cause for this event is attributable to damage incurred from prolonged use and through misuse or rough handling which surgical instruments are subjected to.This is not an event associated with a product failure, malfunction or issue.Surgical instruments condition can be determined while being used for its intended purpose.The replacement of surgical instruments due to normal wear and tear does not indicate a product deficiency, failure or issue.No further action is deemed necessary at this time.
|