• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9300TFX26
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Aortic Regurgitation (1716)
Event Date 02/05/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported, during the transfemoral tavr procedure, a 26mm sapien 3 valve was deployed within an existing 26mm sapien xt valve in order to resolve the patient's central ai.Initially, it was thought that the patient had moderate pvl.During the procedure, the tee showed the anterior leaflet was not moving.The sapien xt valve had been initially deployed via tf approach, as intended, in a 80:20 aortic position, resulting in no pvl.The s3 valve was deployed 70:30 aortic.Repeat tee showed pvl graded at trivial-none.Patient is in stable condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation confirmed that the second valve was placed approximately one year post initial implant.Cine and pre-op ct images were provided and reviewed by an edwards physician proctor: viv angiography: original xt fully expanded.Sapien 3 valve implanted (viv) into xt with good position (b)(6) 2016 tte: poor imaging quality, unable to view valve leaflets well ct.Unable to visualize leaflets impressions: unable to confirm leaflet immobility due to poor imaging quality (unable to visualize leaflets).Sapien 3 viv implant in good position.Regurgitation- central worsening (post tavr, 30 days or >) per the instructions for use, valve regurgitation is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the tavr procedure.Regurgitation which develops progressively over time can be due to a number of issues including patient related factors or structural valve deterioration, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, leaflet thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Regurgitation may also develop progressively if host fibrotic tissue, or pannus, grows onto the bioprosthetic valve.Pannus, a cause of nonstructural dysfunction, may interfere with functionality of the device by restricting the leaflet motion leading to abnormal coaptation.In this case, investigation including review of imaging, was unable to confirm the event or any potential contributing factors.A complaint history for this type of event is reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventive actions are required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
frances preston
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492505190
MDR Report Key5471122
MDR Text Key39414875
Report Number2015691-2016-00616
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/05/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/03/2016
Device Model Number9300TFX26
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/05/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/01/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/19/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age83 YR
Patient Weight101
-
-