• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. TERUMO ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1; CONSOLE, HEART-LUNG MACHINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. TERUMO ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1; CONSOLE, HEART-LUNG MACHINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1 Back to Search Results
Model Number 801074
Device Problem Out-Of-Box Failure (2311)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 02/08/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation is in progress, but not yet concluded.At set-point of 80% the central control monitor (ccm) read 80.6%, servomex o2 analyzer read 75.2% which is outside the limit of +/- 3%.The unit remained powered up for approximately 30 more minutes, then the srt tried calibrating a second time to see if the error was repeatable and received the following results: setpoint: ccm: o2 analyzer: 21%, 21.0, 21.0.30%, 30.6, 30.7.80% , 80.2, 79.9.100%, 99.7, 98.7.The srt replaced this o2 sensor as a result of the initial failure.He ran applicable verification tests.The unit operated to manufacturer specifications and was returned to clinical use.
 
Event Description
Upon receipt of the device, the service repair technician (srt) reported that the electronic patient gas system (epgs) failed the oxygen (o2) sensor reading accuracy portion of the verification test.There was no patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated blocks: device evaluated? and evaluation codes.During laboratory analysis, a lab use only (luo) electronic patient gas system (epgs) with the oxygen (o2) sensor installed, was within specifications regarding o2 accuracy.The product surveillance technician (pst) installed the returned o2 sensor into a luo epgs and connected the epgs to a system-1 simulator and central control monitor (ccm).He connected the epgs to o2 and air, entered a perfusion screen on the ccm.After the 15 minute warm-up period, calibration of the o2 sensor was initiated and passed.The measurement of the direct current (dc) output voltage from the o2 sensor at 5 liters per minute (l/min) and 100% o2 was 1.94 volts, which is within the specification of 0.55-2.758 volts.After initial calibration, he tested the o2 sensor at three set points.(b)(6).Calibrated the epgs a second time and retested at the same three set points.Nothing observed during visual inspection that would cause the failure.(b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint was confirmed.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TERUMO ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1
Type of Device
CONSOLE, HEART-LUNG MACHINE, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS-ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP.
6200 jackson road
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer Contact
jan winder
6200 jackson road
ann arbor, MI 48103
7346634145
MDR Report Key5474279
MDR Text Key39756275
Report Number1828100-2016-00139
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K022947
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date05/12/2016
Device Model Number801074
Device Catalogue Number801074
Device Lot Number12804-018
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/08/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/02/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/23/2016
04/27/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/13/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-