• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BETTLACH UPPER SIDE ARM FOR PELVIC C-CLAMP II; TRACTION, COMPONENT, INVASIVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BETTLACH UPPER SIDE ARM FOR PELVIC C-CLAMP II; TRACTION, COMPONENT, INVASIVE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.306.002
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261); Component Missing (2306); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/29/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The lot number provided could not be verified, without a valid lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported while using the upper side arm for pelvic c-clamp ii during a pelvic surgery where sacroiliac screws were being implanted, it was noted that one of the locking pins was missing from one of the pelvic c-clamp arms.The surgery was completed without any surgical delays as the device was still operable and still held on as expected without the pin.There was no impact to the surgery or to the patient.There was no additional medical intervention required and no surgical delays.The patient was noted to be stable at the end of surgery.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Clarification: the reported lot number, 2694705, was able to be verified.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.As previously reported, the subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Synthes manufacturing location was corrected.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received on march 20, 2016.It was further reported that half of the locking pin was found in the device and the other half of the locking pin was found in the graphics case prior to use on the patient.There were no fragments or pins retained in the patient.The date of the reported surgical procedure was (b)(6) 2016.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A product investigation was completed: per the technique guide, the 03.306.002 upper side arm for pelvic c-clamp ii is an instrument routinely used in the pelvic c-clamp ii system along with the 03.306.000 inner rail for pelvic c-clamp ii, 03.306.001 outer rail for pelvic c-clamp ii for emergency stabilization for unstable injuries and fractures of the pelvic ring.The 03.306.002 upper side arm was returned and reported to be missing a pin from the locking mechanism area.This condition is confirmed; the pin/ sliding portion of the locking mechanism was not returned for the device.It is likely that the pin component was lost during sterile processing leading to this complaint condition.The 03.306.002 upper side arm was manufactured in february 2011 and is over 5 years old.The device is in fairly worn condition with several scrape and scuff marks along its length.The relevant drawings for the entire 03.306.010 assembly and upper arm were reviewed during this evaluation.The locking mechanism pin is pressed into place to secure.The design is determined to be suitable for the intended design, application and dimensional conformity when used as recommended.The condition of the returned 03.306.002 upper side arm does agree with the complaint description.Unable to determine a definitive root cause.It is likely that the pin component was lost during sterile processing leading to this complaint condition.The design is adequate for its intended use when used and maintained as recommended, it did not contribute to the complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UPPER SIDE ARM FOR PELVIC C-CLAMP II
Type of Device
TRACTION, COMPONENT, INVASIVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach PA CH254 4
SZ  CH2544
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach CH254 4
SZ   CH2544
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5504782
MDR Text Key40785160
Report Number2520274-2016-11675
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JEC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK071476
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/29/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03.306.002
Device Lot Number2694705
Other Device ID Number(01)10886982077691(10)2694705
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/10/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/29/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/16/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/05/2016
04/22/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/04/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Weight159
-
-