• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS INNOVA IGS630; SYSTEM, X-RAY ANGIOGRAPHIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS INNOVA IGS630; SYSTEM, X-RAY ANGIOGRAPHIC Back to Search Results
Model Number XCA352
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Radiation Overdose (1510); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/27/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Ge healthcare¿s investigation into the reported occurrence is still ongoing.A follow-up report will be issued when the investigation has been completed.
 
Event Description
The hospital reported that the patient received a peak skin dose around 13.6 gy in the same body area but did not report radiation burn or adverse effect to patient.No injury has been reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Customer will not provide patient information.On (b)(6) 2016 the radiation safety officer (rso) from (b)(6), reported to ge healthcare (gehc) field engineer (fe) that cumulative dose for a patient during exam on (b)(6) 2016 was high.The operator stated the system did not display cumulative dose on monitor only dose area product (dap) resulting in cumulative dose exceeding 3 gy.This investigation used information from gehc fe and system logs.On (b)(6) 2016 gehc fe confirmed dose reading is clear and visible on in room monitors.Fe confirmed system is working within specifications with no monitor malfunction.System dose management and related displays (live monitor-air kerma rate, cumulative air kerma-reference monitor: x-ray time, cumulative air kerma, cumulative air kerma times area product) were functioning properly.System was calibrated in (b)(6) 2015 with fluoro dose rate < 10r/min.Gehc engineering found peak incident air kerma for this exam was 13.6 gy.This long exam used digital subtraction acquisition (dsa) on large patient.The settings were likely determined by physician¿s clinical judgment for best image quality.Dsa are powerful acquisitions that can result in high dose in a short time.Patient sustained no radiation injury, burn or adverse effect.There is no evidence of system malfunction and system was properly calibrated.Site rso confirmed operators were trained by gehc during system installation and declined retraining.Probable root cause is either the user was not aware of location to monitor dose or ignored it.Based on this analysis, no corrective or preventive action is needed.No further action required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INNOVA IGS630
Type of Device
SYSTEM, X-RAY ANGIOGRAPHIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS
283 rue de la miniere
buc 78530
FR  78530
Manufacturer (Section G)
GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS SCS
283 rue de la miniere
buc 78530
FR   78530
Manufacturer Contact
joseph seliga
3000 n grandview blvd.
waukesha, WI 53188
MDR Report Key5508094
MDR Text Key40597927
Report Number9611343-2016-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code IZI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122457
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberXCA352
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/18/2016
Initial Date FDA Received03/17/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/05/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-